Why with Linux?
The first and most obvious question that was lingering in our mind was: Why anyone would consider Linux as an alternative to Windows on the desktop in the first place. Answers from the study provide some initial thoughts here, and when asked in an unprompted manner, while the expected benefits associated with security particularly in relation to malware avoidance and reliability are frequently mentioned, over 70% call out cost control in one form or another as the primary front of mind driver (Figure 1).
The percentage we see here are based on the grouping of freedom responses into the categories listed. Within the cost related category, many allude to savings on licenses, not just in relation to the operating system per se, but also application portfolio which runs on it, which generally includes a high proportion of open source software in a Linux environment. The ability to run on lower spec equipment is another common cost related driver. It is notable, however, that the majority of responses make reference to an overall lowering of total cost of ownership(TCO).
While open questioning like this is great for understanding how people expresses the benefits and drivers that are important respondents in more specific areas we can get more of a feel for what’s behind the statements about lower TCO ( Figure 2).

Of course in reality, some of the drivers and benefits we are looking at here are related. In particular, while some argue that it is possible to achieve higher degree of security with Linux, which os basically a risk related driver, others say the main point is that it costs less in terms of time and effort to achieve and maintain an acceptable level of security, which brings us back to TCO. In a similar manner, the perceived benefits in relation to stability and reliability would have a user experience related impact, but would aso translate to reduced maintenance and support overhead.
What’s interesting about all of theses observations is that the focus among those with more serious business-oriented deployment experience is very much on tangible benefits. This is in stark contrast to many of the emotional and ideological related arguments we hear from the more extreme factions within the open source community, whose noisy and forceful views often detract from the practical and objective discussion of value that should really be taking place.
Related to this is the question of where desktop Linux fits into the business computing landscape. Should organisations be aiming for a wholesale replacement of Windows as many Linux evangelists would suggest , or is there a middle ground?

